Parallel society: Difference between revisions
Eleutherious (talk | contribs) Plainer prose: fewer quotes, glosses folded in, claims attributed |
Eleutherious (talk | contribs) Course no longer cited as a source: views attributed to Logos, plain facts stated plainly |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== The basics == | == The basics == | ||
Logos defines a parallel society as an alternative set of institutions run by their users, alongside the official ones. They provide their own ways to learn, to save, to settle disputes and to care for each other. In its account, people turn to such an institution when an official one fails them, and it earns that place by working better. | |||
The [[Start a Circle/Parallel Society Playbook|Parallel Society Playbook]] in the Logos Circles handbook frames the idea as a form of non-violent civil resistance. In it, an organised group builds parallel civil structures alongside harmful and unfair ones. It traces the concept to Czechoslovak dissidents living under a totalitarian regime. Its five intended outcomes are sovereign individuals, sound money, private coordination, healthy communities and a culture of civic virtue. | The [[Start a Circle/Parallel Society Playbook|Parallel Society Playbook]] in the Logos Circles handbook frames the idea as a form of non-violent civil resistance. In it, an organised group builds parallel civil structures alongside harmful and unfair ones. It traces the concept to Czechoslovak dissidents living under a totalitarian regime. Its five intended outcomes are sovereign individuals, sound money, private coordination, healthy communities and a culture of civic virtue. | ||
Logos sets three limits on the term. A parallel society runs alongside ordinary life, which sets it apart from withdrawal into a commune. It takes over what the old offices were failing to do, without competing for the offices themselves. And it is built while the old system still stands, without waiting for a collapse. | |||
In the | In the Logos view, a parallel society needs two things. One is a group of committed builders whose results are good enough that joining becomes the obvious choice, and a majority is not required. The other is an economy of its own. It argues that no one leaves a system they still depend on to survive, so people must be able to earn, save and trade outside it. | ||
The reasons Logos gives for building one are set out on [[Institutional decline]]. | The reasons Logos gives for building one are set out on [[Institutional decline]]. | ||
== How it applies to Logos == | == How it applies to Logos == | ||
Logos presents itself as the private-by-default technology stack for parallel societies, which its website describes as communities, institutions and economies that operate outside the legacy system. | Logos presents itself as the private-by-default technology stack for parallel societies, which its website describes as communities, institutions and economies that operate outside the legacy system. Logos treats the technology as a catalyst, with the Circle and the institutions it builds coming first. A 2025 Logos article on the Lisbon and Berlin Circles describes Circles as designed to evolve into parallel structures that stand alongside existing institutions. | ||
=== Institutions by area === | === Institutions by area === | ||
Logos uses a broad definition of an institution. It is any established arrangement a society relies on to meet a shared need, covering the rules, the organisation that keeps them and the service people count on. Banks, courts, schools and hospitals qualify, and so do a co-op, a savings group and a mediation table. Logos institutions, as it describes them, are run by the people who use them and are voluntary, self-funded, decentralised and free from capture. | |||
The basic unit is the [[Circles|Circle]], which Logos describes as a self-organised group solving winnable issues that matter locally. Each Circle organises around a need in one of eight areas of everyday life. The areas match the eight [[Start a Circle/Circles Civil Society Issue Buckets (Pilot)|civil society Issue Buckets]] in the Circles handbook, each with a three-letter code. | The basic unit is the [[Circles|Circle]], which Logos describes as a self-organised group solving winnable issues that matter locally. Each Circle organises around a need in one of eight areas of everyday life. The areas match the eight [[Start a Circle/Circles Civil Society Issue Buckets (Pilot)|civil society Issue Buckets]] in the Circles handbook, each with a three-letter code. Logos gives examples for seven of them: | ||
* '''Economy (ECO):''' a food co-op or a credit union. | * '''Economy (ECO):''' a food co-op or a credit union. | ||
* '''Housing (HOU):''' a community land trust or a housing co-op. | * '''Housing (HOU):''' a community land trust or a housing co-op. | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
* '''Infrastructure (INF):''' a tool library, community WiFi or an energy co-op. | * '''Infrastructure (INF):''' a tool library, community WiFi or an energy co-op. | ||
* '''Education (EDU):''' schools and classes run by the community. | * '''Education (EDU):''' schools and classes run by the community. | ||
It gives no example for the eighth area, which the handbook calls Rule of Law & Institutions (INS). The handbook's beginner actions for it include community mediation tables for small disputes, legal-rights clinics with pro-bono lawyers and municipal budget analysis. | |||
=== What Circles have done === | === What Circles have done === | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
=== From first win to institution === | === From first win to institution === | ||
Logos describes growth in steps, each small enough to finish: | |||
# '''The activation.''' One visible win, run in a day, draws people to the cause. | # '''The activation.''' One visible win, run in a day, draws people to the cause. | ||
# '''The Circle.''' The people it drew form a community and pick their first [[Winnable issue|winnable issue]]. | # '''The Circle.''' The people it drew form a community and pick their first [[Winnable issue|winnable issue]]. | ||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
# '''The institution.''' The wins become permanent, with rules, people responsible and a record of delivering. | # '''The institution.''' The wins become permanent, with rules, people responsible and a record of delivering. | ||
# '''The economy.''' Institutions that hold become places to earn, save and trade outside the old system. | # '''The economy.''' Institutions that hold become places to earn, save and trade outside the old system. | ||
In | In its account, the endpoint is a parallel society that outlasts the old system because it does the job better. Elsewhere it has a Circle start with one need and one activation day. It calls this the build rules at work: know who is in, start small, win something real, then grow. The rules are set out on [[Commons governance]]. | ||
The Circles handbook describes the same path. Its Issue Buckets page advises a steward to begin with one visible win on an issue they care deeply about. The [[Start a Circle/Circles Charter|Circles Charter]] expects that over time Circles will grow beyond meetup groups into self-sustaining local institutions. The Playbook records each solved issue so that other Circles can learn from that experience and adapt it locally. | The Circles handbook describes the same path. Its Issue Buckets page advises a steward to begin with one visible win on an issue they care deeply about. The [[Start a Circle/Circles Charter|Circles Charter]] expects that over time Circles will grow beyond meetup groups into self-sustaining local institutions. The Playbook records each solved issue so that other Circles can learn from that experience and adapt it locally. | ||
== Examples == | == Examples == | ||
Logos presents the parallel society as a recurring response with several precedents. | |||
* '''Czechoslovakia.''' In ''[[The Power of the Powerless]]'', dated October 1978, Václav Havel described a greengrocer who displays a regime slogan in his shop as a sign of submission. The essay credits Václav Benda with the idea of developing parallel structures. Benda, a [[Charter 77]] signatory, called for parallel institutions that would be more responsive to human needs. | * '''Czechoslovakia.''' In ''[[The Power of the Powerless]]'', dated October 1978, Václav Havel described a greengrocer who displays a regime slogan in his shop as a sign of submission. The essay credits Václav Benda with the idea of developing parallel structures. Benda, a [[Charter 77]] signatory, called for parallel institutions that would be more responsive to human needs. Logos credits these dissidents with underground universities in private flats, banned books retyped by hand as [[Samizdat|samizdat]], a parallel music scene and mutual aid networks. The first issue of the Logos zine [[LAN]] looks back to the mass protests that swept the country in 1989. It argues that this self-organisation provided part of the civic infrastructure through which the opposition came together quickly. See [[Parallel polis]] and [[Issue 1/Parallel Society]]. | ||
* '''Poland.''' Solidarity was founded in Gdańsk on 22 September 1980 as the first independent labour union in a Soviet bloc country. It had about 10 million members by early 1981. After martial law was imposed on 13 December 1981, it continued as an underground organisation. In April 1989 the government agreed to legalise it, and in the June 1989 elections its candidates won 99 of the 100 Senate seats. The Solidarity activist Zbigniew Bujak said Havel's essay reached his group at the Ursus factory in 1979, when they felt they were "at the end of the road". | * '''Poland.''' Solidarity was founded in Gdańsk on 22 September 1980 as the first independent labour union in a Soviet bloc country. It had about 10 million members by early 1981. After martial law was imposed on 13 December 1981, it continued as an underground organisation. In April 1989 the government agreed to legalise it, and in the June 1989 elections its candidates won 99 of the 100 Senate seats. The Solidarity activist Zbigniew Bujak said Havel's essay reached his group at the Ursus factory in 1979, when they felt they were "at the end of the road". Logos says Solidarity built its own unions and schools under communism. | ||
* '''Commons.''' | * '''Commons.''' Logos cites Alpine villages that have run common pastures for centuries and Spanish communities that share irrigation water. See [[Commons governance]]. | ||
* '''Cherán.''' | * '''Cherán.''' Logos cites Cherán, a town in Michoacán, Mexico, whose residents organised their own defence and government. The town has governed itself since 2011. See [[Cherán]]. | ||
* '''Logos Circles.''' The first issue of LAN opened with the claim that "The parallel society already exists." Its examples were a food bank in Ibadan, a node behind a hotel router in Prague, a school under a tree in Delhi and activists in Benin City raising money for a member's treatment. See [[Issue 1/Editorial]] and [[Issue 1/Under a Tree]]. | * '''Logos Circles.''' The first issue of LAN opened with the claim that "The parallel society already exists." Its examples were a food bank in Ibadan, a node behind a hotel router in Prague, a school under a tree in Delhi and activists in Benin City raising money for a member's treatment. See [[Issue 1/Editorial]] and [[Issue 1/Under a Tree]]. | ||
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
== Sources == | == Sources == | ||
* | * Logos Circles training material, 2026 | ||
* [https://logos.co/movement Logos Movement], Logos, read 2026-11-04 | * [https://logos.co/movement Logos Movement], Logos, read 2026-11-04 | ||
* [https://logos.co Logos], Logos, read 2026-11-04 | * [https://logos.co Logos], Logos, read 2026-11-04 | ||
Latest revision as of 23:55, 4 November 2026
Parallel society is the term the Logos movement uses for a set of institutions built and run by the people who use them, working alongside official institutions that Logos considers to be failing. Logos describes itself as a movement building a parallel society. The idea draws on Václav Benda's parallel polis and on older traditions of self-governed commons.
The basics
Logos defines a parallel society as an alternative set of institutions run by their users, alongside the official ones. They provide their own ways to learn, to save, to settle disputes and to care for each other. In its account, people turn to such an institution when an official one fails them, and it earns that place by working better.
The Parallel Society Playbook in the Logos Circles handbook frames the idea as a form of non-violent civil resistance. In it, an organised group builds parallel civil structures alongside harmful and unfair ones. It traces the concept to Czechoslovak dissidents living under a totalitarian regime. Its five intended outcomes are sovereign individuals, sound money, private coordination, healthy communities and a culture of civic virtue.
Logos sets three limits on the term. A parallel society runs alongside ordinary life, which sets it apart from withdrawal into a commune. It takes over what the old offices were failing to do, without competing for the offices themselves. And it is built while the old system still stands, without waiting for a collapse.
In the Logos view, a parallel society needs two things. One is a group of committed builders whose results are good enough that joining becomes the obvious choice, and a majority is not required. The other is an economy of its own. It argues that no one leaves a system they still depend on to survive, so people must be able to earn, save and trade outside it.
The reasons Logos gives for building one are set out on Institutional decline.
How it applies to Logos
Logos presents itself as the private-by-default technology stack for parallel societies, which its website describes as communities, institutions and economies that operate outside the legacy system. Logos treats the technology as a catalyst, with the Circle and the institutions it builds coming first. A 2025 Logos article on the Lisbon and Berlin Circles describes Circles as designed to evolve into parallel structures that stand alongside existing institutions.
Institutions by area
Logos uses a broad definition of an institution. It is any established arrangement a society relies on to meet a shared need, covering the rules, the organisation that keeps them and the service people count on. Banks, courts, schools and hospitals qualify, and so do a co-op, a savings group and a mediation table. Logos institutions, as it describes them, are run by the people who use them and are voluntary, self-funded, decentralised and free from capture.
The basic unit is the Circle, which Logos describes as a self-organised group solving winnable issues that matter locally. Each Circle organises around a need in one of eight areas of everyday life. The areas match the eight civil society Issue Buckets in the Circles handbook, each with a three-letter code. Logos gives examples for seven of them:
- Economy (ECO): a food co-op or a credit union.
- Housing (HOU): a community land trust or a housing co-op.
- Health (HLT): a health co-op or community health workers.
- Welfare (WEL): a rotating savings group that pays out when a member is hit hard.
- Security (SEC): community-led safety, from a network of safe havens to violence interruption.
- Infrastructure (INF): a tool library, community WiFi or an energy co-op.
- Education (EDU): schools and classes run by the community.
It gives no example for the eighth area, which the handbook calls Rule of Law & Institutions (INS). The handbook's beginner actions for it include community mediation tables for small disputes, legal-rights clinics with pro-bono lawyers and municipal budget analysis.
What Circles have done
Circle reports and Playbook entries, which are the Circles' own accounts, record early work in most areas.
- Economy. The Awka Circle ran a staged route from CV training to internships for local tech talent and reported about 11 internships. See Playbook/Awka: Skills-to-employment training and internships for local tech talent.
- Housing. The Aba Circle brought tenants, landlords and a lawyer into one room on tenancy rights. It reported 40 attendees, and two tenants each received a refund of two months' rent. See Playbook/Aba: Bringing landlords and tenants into one room on tenancy rights.
- Health. The Kaduna Circle reported that its free medical outreach served more than 100 people, against a target of 50. See Playbook/Kaduna: Free medical outreach for over 100 widows and elderly residents.
- Welfare. The Benin City Circle raised money for the urgent healthcare costs of a member's parent. See Issue 1/For One of Our Own.
- Infrastructure. The Lisbon Circle worked with a social housing neighbourhood whose community leader was then given the keys to a community centre. See Playbook/Lisbon: Securing a community space for a social housing neighbourhood.
- Education. The Zanzibar Circle raised funds for Raspberry Pi computers, which were donated to a community school. See Circles/Zanzibar.
From first win to institution
Logos describes growth in steps, each small enough to finish:
- The activation. One visible win, run in a day, draws people to the cause.
- The Circle. The people it drew form a community and pick their first winnable issue.
- The cycle. The Circle wins the issue, keeps the gain and picks the next one.
- The stack. The work moves onto infrastructure the old system cannot reach.
- The institution. The wins become permanent, with rules, people responsible and a record of delivering.
- The economy. Institutions that hold become places to earn, save and trade outside the old system.
In its account, the endpoint is a parallel society that outlasts the old system because it does the job better. Elsewhere it has a Circle start with one need and one activation day. It calls this the build rules at work: know who is in, start small, win something real, then grow. The rules are set out on Commons governance.
The Circles handbook describes the same path. Its Issue Buckets page advises a steward to begin with one visible win on an issue they care deeply about. The Circles Charter expects that over time Circles will grow beyond meetup groups into self-sustaining local institutions. The Playbook records each solved issue so that other Circles can learn from that experience and adapt it locally.
Examples
Logos presents the parallel society as a recurring response with several precedents.
- Czechoslovakia. In The Power of the Powerless, dated October 1978, Václav Havel described a greengrocer who displays a regime slogan in his shop as a sign of submission. The essay credits Václav Benda with the idea of developing parallel structures. Benda, a Charter 77 signatory, called for parallel institutions that would be more responsive to human needs. Logos credits these dissidents with underground universities in private flats, banned books retyped by hand as samizdat, a parallel music scene and mutual aid networks. The first issue of the Logos zine LAN looks back to the mass protests that swept the country in 1989. It argues that this self-organisation provided part of the civic infrastructure through which the opposition came together quickly. See Parallel polis and Issue 1/Parallel Society.
- Poland. Solidarity was founded in Gdańsk on 22 September 1980 as the first independent labour union in a Soviet bloc country. It had about 10 million members by early 1981. After martial law was imposed on 13 December 1981, it continued as an underground organisation. In April 1989 the government agreed to legalise it, and in the June 1989 elections its candidates won 99 of the 100 Senate seats. The Solidarity activist Zbigniew Bujak said Havel's essay reached his group at the Ursus factory in 1979, when they felt they were "at the end of the road". Logos says Solidarity built its own unions and schools under communism.
- Commons. Logos cites Alpine villages that have run common pastures for centuries and Spanish communities that share irrigation water. See Commons governance.
- Cherán. Logos cites Cherán, a town in Michoacán, Mexico, whose residents organised their own defence and government. The town has governed itself since 2011. See Cherán.
- Logos Circles. The first issue of LAN opened with the claim that "The parallel society already exists." Its examples were a food bank in Ibadan, a node behind a hotel router in Prague, a school under a tree in Delhi and activists in Benin City raising money for a member's treatment. See Issue 1/Editorial and Issue 1/Under a Tree.
See also
- Parallel polis
- The Parallel Polis
- The Power of the Powerless
- Commons governance
- Cherán
- Institutional decline
- Circles
- Start a Circle/Parallel Society Playbook
- Exit
Takes on this idea
None yet. See Takes.
Sources
- Logos Circles training material, 2026
- Logos Movement, Logos, read 2026-11-04
- Logos, Logos, read 2026-11-04
- Prototyping Parallel Institutions: Learnings for Logos Circles, Logos, 9 October 2025
- About Parallel Societies, Parallel Society Playbook, Logos Circles handbook, read 2026-11-04
- Circles Civil Society Issue Buckets (Pilot), Logos Circles handbook, read 2026-11-04
- Circles Charter, Logos Circles handbook, read 2026-11-04
- Parallel Society Playbook (for stewards), Logos Circles handbook, read 2026-11-04
- Skills-to-employment training and internships for local tech talent, Parallel Society Playbook, read 2026-11-04
- Bringing landlords and tenants into one room on tenancy rights, Parallel Society Playbook, read 2026-11-04
- Free medical outreach for over 100 widows and elderly residents, Parallel Society Playbook, read 2026-11-04
- Securing a community space for a social housing neighbourhood, Parallel Society Playbook, read 2026-11-04
- Winnable Issues from Circles, Logos Circles handbook, read 2026-11-04
- Local Area Network, Issue 1, Logos, September 2026 (Editorial, p. 1, and "The Parallel Society", p. 4)
- Václav Havel, The Power of the Powerless, translated by Paul Wilson, The Anarchist Library
- The Power of the Powerless, Wikipedia
- Václav Benda, Wikipedia
- Solidarity, Encyclopaedia Britannica
- Cherán, Wikipedia
Page status: Outline. Stub · Outline · Usable · Guide · Star. Anyone can improve this page and change its status.