Commons governance: Difference between revisions
Eleutherious (talk | contribs) Second check fixes, plus material from the Circles handbook, Circle reports, LAN and Logos docs, source-checked |
Eleutherious (talk | contribs) Plainer prose: fewer quotes, glosses folded in, claims attributed |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Commons governance''' is the management of a shared resource, such as a pasture, a forest or a water supply, by the people who use it, under rules they set and enforce themselves. The Logos activist course ''Building a Parallel Society'' | '''Commons governance''' is the management of a shared resource, such as a pasture, a forest or a water supply, by the people who use it, under rules they set and enforce themselves. The Logos activist course ''Building a Parallel Society'' treats it as evidence that ordinary people can run lasting institutions with no one above them. It is a building block of the [[Parallel society|parallel society]] that [[Logos]] promotes. | ||
== The basics == | == The basics == | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* Spanish farming communities that have shared irrigation water among thousands of families for over five hundred years. | * Spanish farming communities that have shared irrigation water among thousands of families for over five hundred years. | ||
The course | The course notes that these cases have been studied closely, failures included, such as fisheries where no rule could stick and water systems that tried to fix everything at once. From this record, without naming a researcher, it draws four build rules: | ||
# '''Membership.''' A group knows who is in and who is not. | # '''Membership.''' A group knows who is in and who is not. In the course's view, rules without a membership boundary do not last. | ||
# '''Scale.''' A group starts small and wins something real before it grows. | # '''Scale.''' A group starts small and wins something real before it grows. | ||
# '''Disputes.''' A group settles disputes in its own arena, with people it recognises. | # '''Disputes.''' A group settles disputes in its own arena, with people it recognises. | ||
# '''Nesting.''' Small groups nest into larger ones, never in one leap. | # '''Nesting.''' Small groups nest into larger ones, never in one leap. | ||
=== Ostrom's design principles === | === Ostrom's design principles === | ||
Cases matching both descriptions appear in the work of the political scientist Elinor Ostrom. In her 1990 book ''Governing the Commons'' she proposed eight principles that contribute to the success of self-governed commons | Cases matching both descriptions appear in the work of the political scientist Elinor Ostrom, who shared the 2009 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences. In her 1990 book ''Governing the Commons'' she proposed eight principles that contribute to the success of self-governed commons. A chapter of the book is titled "Analyzing Institutional Failures and Fragilities". | ||
The P2P Foundation summarises the eight design principles as: | The P2P Foundation summarises the eight design principles as follows: | ||
# Clearly defined boundaries, which define who has access to the resource. | # Clearly defined boundaries, which define who has access to the resource. | ||
# Rules for use and provision that are tailored to local conditions. | # Rules for use and provision that are tailored to local conditions. | ||
| Line 27: | Line 26: | ||
=== Criticism === | === Criticism === | ||
Samuel Garrido examined the Spanish cases in the journal Historia Agraria in 2011. He | Samuel Garrido examined the Spanish cases in the journal Historia Agraria in 2011. He argued that Ostrom's information on them came from works that defended their democratic character, a view with which "most Spanish experts disagree". When he tested whether her eight principles were present in the huertas, he found that sometimes they were not. | ||
== How it applies to Logos == | == How it applies to Logos == | ||
The course applies the build rules to [[Circles]]. | The course applies the build rules to [[Circles]]. In its account a Circle starts with one need, one activation day and one community, and grows into a working institution. It sums this up as the build rules at work: know who is in, start small, win something real, then grow. | ||
The Logos Circles handbook carries related rules. | The Logos Circles handbook carries related rules. Under the [[Start a Circle/Circles Charter|Circles Charter]], participants join an action rather than a discussion, and after the first issue the Circle decides as a group what to tackle next. The handbook's Issue Buckets page asks a steward to begin with one visible win and then gradually connect with other Circles to tackle bigger issues. The [[Start a Circle/Roadmap for Logos Circles|roadmap]] adopts for Circles a snowflake model of small autonomous groups with distributed leadership. The Kano Circle drew a similar lesson from its own work when it cut a school hygiene plan from six schools to four. It concluded that focusing on fewer sites is better than spreading the Circle too thin. See [[Playbook/Kano: Building lasting hygiene habits in schools and orphanages]]. | ||
=== Kampala: a ledger for savings cooperatives === | === Kampala: a ledger for savings cooperatives === | ||
In Uganda, savings and credit cooperatives, known as SACCOs, hold the money of ordinary members. The [[Circles/Kampala|Kampala Circle]] is building a ledger for them on the [[Logos Blockchain]]. Its September 2026 report named | In Uganda, savings and credit cooperatives, known as SACCOs, hold the money of ordinary members. The [[Circles/Kampala|Kampala Circle]] is building a ledger for them on the [[Logos Blockchain]]. Its September 2026 report named trust gaps between SACCO members and leadership, and manual, paper-based financial records, as problems. Its October 2026 report cited a reported case of a SACCO holding the savings of 34 deceased members over inheritance disputes. | ||
The | The October report sets out a design that keeps the money off the chain: "The program is a record, not a custodian." Members' money stays in mobile money and bank accounts, and the chain records deposits, approvals and expenses with evidence. A supervisory committee account sits alongside the committee that approves, so oversight is split from approval. Approval rules can be set for each SACCO. The report argues that institutional, community and trader SACCOs govern themselves differently, so one chain-wide rule would be wrong. Each member's balance stays private, while each SACCO's totals stay public and verifiable. | ||
At the time of the October report the project had no pilot SACCO | At the time of the October report the project had no pilot SACCO, and finding one was listed as an open question. See [[Issue 2/Every Shilling Accounted For]]. | ||
=== A planned savings fund === | === A planned savings fund === | ||
A section of the Circles Charter headed "Future Direction (Charter V2)" sets out plans that are not yet in force. | A section of the Circles Charter headed "Future Direction (Charter V2)" sets out plans that are not yet in force. Under it, every Circle will operate a local savings and mutual aid fund, with officer roles that include a treasurer and a warden. Withdrawals from the fund would require dual authorisation by the treasurer and the Steward. The warden would manage disputes where appropriate and escalate serious issues when necessary. | ||
== Examples == | == Examples == | ||
* '''Törbel, Switzerland.''' Törbel is a village in the Upper Valais that Ostrom visited in the 1980s. Its first written entries on the division of land date back to 1224. On 1 February 1483 its members set up an association whose rules for governing the commons are still in effect, according to a study of Ostrom's work by the legal scholar Grzegorz Blicharz. | * '''Törbel, Switzerland.''' Törbel is a village in the Upper Valais that Ostrom visited in the 1980s. Its first written entries on the division of land date back to 1224. On 1 February 1483 its members set up an association whose rules for governing the commons are still in effect, according to a study of Ostrom's work by the legal scholar Grzegorz Blicharz. | ||
* '''Huertas of eastern Spain.''' Ostrom's sample included the irrigation communities in the huertas of Valencia, Murcia, Orihuela and Alicante. Blicharz dates the written laws of the huertas to 29 May 1435. UNESCO listed the Water Tribunal of the Plain of Valencia and the Council of Wise Men of the Plain of Murcia as intangible cultural heritage | * '''Huertas of eastern Spain.''' Ostrom's sample included the irrigation communities in the huertas of Valencia, Murcia, Orihuela and Alicante. Blicharz dates the written laws of the huertas to 29 May 1435. In 2009 UNESCO listed the Water Tribunal of the Plain of Valencia and the Council of Wise Men of the Plain of Murcia as intangible cultural heritage. The Water Tribunal's eight elected administrators represent 11,691 members from nine communities. Its members are elected democratically and settle disputes orally. | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
Revision as of 23:31, 4 November 2026
Commons governance is the management of a shared resource, such as a pasture, a forest or a water supply, by the people who use it, under rules they set and enforce themselves. The Logos activist course Building a Parallel Society treats it as evidence that ordinary people can run lasting institutions with no one above them. It is a building block of the parallel society that Logos promotes.
The basics
The course calls commons governance the "prior claim" on which the idea of a parallel society rests: that ordinary people can run institutions that last. It cites two cases:
- Alpine villages that have run their common pastures under their own rules for centuries, one of them under a written charter since the 1200s.
- Spanish farming communities that have shared irrigation water among thousands of families for over five hundred years.
The course notes that these cases have been studied closely, failures included, such as fisheries where no rule could stick and water systems that tried to fix everything at once. From this record, without naming a researcher, it draws four build rules:
- Membership. A group knows who is in and who is not. In the course's view, rules without a membership boundary do not last.
- Scale. A group starts small and wins something real before it grows.
- Disputes. A group settles disputes in its own arena, with people it recognises.
- Nesting. Small groups nest into larger ones, never in one leap.
Ostrom's design principles
Cases matching both descriptions appear in the work of the political scientist Elinor Ostrom, who shared the 2009 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences. In her 1990 book Governing the Commons she proposed eight principles that contribute to the success of self-governed commons. A chapter of the book is titled "Analyzing Institutional Failures and Fragilities".
The P2P Foundation summarises the eight design principles as follows:
- Clearly defined boundaries, which define who has access to the resource.
- Rules for use and provision that are tailored to local conditions.
- Collective-choice arrangements that let most users take part in decisions.
- Effective monitoring by people accountable to the users.
- Graduated sanctions for those who break the rules.
- Conflict-resolution mechanisms that are cheap and quick to reach.
- Recognition of the community's right to organise by higher authorities.
- Nested enterprises, with small local units inside larger layers.
Criticism
Samuel Garrido examined the Spanish cases in the journal Historia Agraria in 2011. He argued that Ostrom's information on them came from works that defended their democratic character, a view with which "most Spanish experts disagree". When he tested whether her eight principles were present in the huertas, he found that sometimes they were not.
How it applies to Logos
The course applies the build rules to Circles. In its account a Circle starts with one need, one activation day and one community, and grows into a working institution. It sums this up as the build rules at work: know who is in, start small, win something real, then grow.
The Logos Circles handbook carries related rules. Under the Circles Charter, participants join an action rather than a discussion, and after the first issue the Circle decides as a group what to tackle next. The handbook's Issue Buckets page asks a steward to begin with one visible win and then gradually connect with other Circles to tackle bigger issues. The roadmap adopts for Circles a snowflake model of small autonomous groups with distributed leadership. The Kano Circle drew a similar lesson from its own work when it cut a school hygiene plan from six schools to four. It concluded that focusing on fewer sites is better than spreading the Circle too thin. See Playbook/Kano: Building lasting hygiene habits in schools and orphanages.
Kampala: a ledger for savings cooperatives
In Uganda, savings and credit cooperatives, known as SACCOs, hold the money of ordinary members. The Kampala Circle is building a ledger for them on the Logos Blockchain. Its September 2026 report named trust gaps between SACCO members and leadership, and manual, paper-based financial records, as problems. Its October 2026 report cited a reported case of a SACCO holding the savings of 34 deceased members over inheritance disputes.
The October report sets out a design that keeps the money off the chain: "The program is a record, not a custodian." Members' money stays in mobile money and bank accounts, and the chain records deposits, approvals and expenses with evidence. A supervisory committee account sits alongside the committee that approves, so oversight is split from approval. Approval rules can be set for each SACCO. The report argues that institutional, community and trader SACCOs govern themselves differently, so one chain-wide rule would be wrong. Each member's balance stays private, while each SACCO's totals stay public and verifiable.
At the time of the October report the project had no pilot SACCO, and finding one was listed as an open question. See Issue 2/Every Shilling Accounted For.
A planned savings fund
A section of the Circles Charter headed "Future Direction (Charter V2)" sets out plans that are not yet in force. Under it, every Circle will operate a local savings and mutual aid fund, with officer roles that include a treasurer and a warden. Withdrawals from the fund would require dual authorisation by the treasurer and the Steward. The warden would manage disputes where appropriate and escalate serious issues when necessary.
Examples
- Törbel, Switzerland. Törbel is a village in the Upper Valais that Ostrom visited in the 1980s. Its first written entries on the division of land date back to 1224. On 1 February 1483 its members set up an association whose rules for governing the commons are still in effect, according to a study of Ostrom's work by the legal scholar Grzegorz Blicharz.
- Huertas of eastern Spain. Ostrom's sample included the irrigation communities in the huertas of Valencia, Murcia, Orihuela and Alicante. Blicharz dates the written laws of the huertas to 29 May 1435. In 2009 UNESCO listed the Water Tribunal of the Plain of Valencia and the Council of Wise Men of the Plain of Murcia as intangible cultural heritage. The Water Tribunal's eight elected administrators represent 11,691 members from nine communities. Its members are elected democratically and settle disputes orally.
See also
Takes on this idea
None yet. See Takes.
Sources
- Building a Parallel Society, Logos activist course, 2026
- The Swiss commune that inspired a Nobel prize-winning theory on communal ownership, Le News, 13 December 2016
- Elinor Ostrom, Governing the Commons, Cambridge University Press
- Elinor Ostrom's Eight Commons Governance Design Principles, P2P Foundation Wiki, 2020
- Learning how to share: principles for governing the commons, Arizona State University, 7 October 2016
- Samuel Garrido, Las instituciones de riego en la España del este. Una reflexión a la luz de la obra de Elinor Ostrom, Historia Agraria 53, April 2011
- Grzegorz J. Blicharz, Governing the Commons in the Era of Decodification and Self-Responsible Societies, Digital Library of the Commons, Indiana University
- Circles Charter, Logos Circles handbook, read 2026-11-04
- Circles Civil Society Issue Buckets (Pilot), Logos Circles handbook, read 2026-11-04
- Roadmap for Logos Circles, Logos Circles handbook, read 2026-11-04
- Building lasting hygiene habits in schools and orphanages, Parallel Society Playbook, read 2026-11-04
- Logos Circle Kampala Report, September 2026, Logos Forum, 28 September 2026
- Logos Circle Kampala Report, October 2026, Logos Forum, 26 October 2026
- Local Area Network, Issue 2, Logos, October 2026 ("Every Shilling Accounted For", p. 8)
- Irrigators' tribunals of the Spanish Mediterranean coast, UNESCO, 2009